Head to head

Comparisons worth publishing.

Comparisons82
Compounds39

Forty compounds make 780 possible pairings, and almost all of them would be the same page with two names swapped. These are the ones where the data actually differs: same class and same target, or the same primary goal reached two different ways. Every one ends in a written verdict, including the ones where the honest verdict is that there is no winner.

3 comparisons

GLP-1 / incretin

Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.

21 comparisons

GH secretagogue

Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.

6 comparisons

Healing & repair

Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.

10 comparisons

Metabolic

Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.

11 comparisons

Nootropic

Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.

1 comparison

Immune

Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.

3 comparisons

Cosmetic

Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.

6 comparisons

Other

Within-class matchups where both compounds are aimed at the same thing.

21 comparisons

Across classes

Different mechanisms that get compared anyway, because they are pointed at the same goal. These are the ones most likely to end in "they do different things".

5-Amino-1MQ vs TesamorelinMetabolicGH secretagogueOne has been tested in people; the other has notCagrilintide vs MK-677MetabolicGH secretagogueSame score, opposite directionsCagrilintide vs RetatrutideMetabolicGLP-1 / incretinNo winner in this dataCagrilintide vs SemaglutideMetabolicGLP-1 / incretinUsually stacked — and Semaglutide rests on firmer evidenceCagrilintide vs TirzepatideMetabolicGLP-1 / incretinTirzepatide rests on firmer evidenceCJC-1295 with DAC vs IGF-1 LR3GH secretagogueOtherNo winner in this dataCJC-1295 without DAC vs DSIPGH secretagogueNootropicDSIP rests on firmer evidenceCJC-1295 without DAC vs SelankGH secretagogueNootropicOne has been tested in people; the other has notDSIP vs IpamorelinNootropicGH secretagogueNot an either/orDSIP vs SermorelinNootropicGH secretagogueSermorelin rests on firmer evidenceHexarelin vs IGF-1 LR3GH secretagogueOtherOne has been tested in people; the other has notIpamorelin vs SelankGH secretagogueNootropicSelank rests on firmer evidenceMK-677 vs RetatrutideGH secretagogueGLP-1 / incretinSame score, opposite directionsMK-677 vs SemaglutideGH secretagogueGLP-1 / incretinSame score, opposite directionsMK-677 vs TesofensineGH secretagogueMetabolicSame score, opposite directionsMK-677 vs TirzepatideGH secretagogueGLP-1 / incretinSame score, opposite directionsRetatrutide vs TesofensineGLP-1 / incretinMetabolicRoute decides this one, not potencySelank vs SermorelinNootropicGH secretagogueRoute decides this one, not potencySemaglutide vs TesofensineGLP-1 / incretinMetabolicNo winner in this dataSLU-PP-332 vs TesamorelinMetabolicGH secretagogueOne has been tested in people; the other has notTesofensine vs TirzepatideMetabolicGLP-1 / incretinRoute decides this one, not potency

Deliberately absent

Compounds with no comparison page

4 compounds have no head-to-head page here, and that is the finding rather than a gap. Their own goal weightings never clear the threshold used to publish a pairing, which is this dataset saying there is no strong enough claim to hold up against anything else. The monographs still cover them.

Educational information only, not medical advice. Talk to a licensed clinician before starting, changing, or stopping anything.