Head to head
CJC-1295 without DAC vs MK-677
Two compounds that are more often stacked than compared — the side-by-side data, and what actually separates them.
Verdict
Usually stacked — and only MK-677 has human trial data
What you are actually choosing between
Before anything else: the dataset lists CJC-1295 without DAC and MK-677 in each other's stacks. They are run together more often than they are chosen between, so if you came here for a winner, the first honest answer is that this may not be an either/or.
Both are classed here as growth hormone secretagogues, so this is a within-class choice: the mechanism is broadly shared and what separates them is kinetics, route, and how much has actually been tested.
The overlap is recovery and sleep and muscle growth. On this site's goal weighting — an editorial priority score, not a measure of effect size — CJC-1295 without DAC rates 4/5 for recovery and sleep and MK-677 rates 5/5. Outside that overlap only MK-677 goes further, carrying weight for appetite control; CJC-1295 without DAC's declared goals stop at the overlap.
The evidence
This is the part that decides most of it. MK-677 has controlled human trials behind it, without an approval — never approved, and trials flagged higher fasting glucose. CJC-1295 without DAC has no controlled human data at all, so the numbers here come from practice, not a label — the closest approved comparators are sermorelin and tesamorelin. That gap is the headline, and it is a statement about the literature rather than a promise about you: a compound with trial data can still do nothing for your case, and one without it is unproven rather than disproven.
How they differ in practice
CJC-1295 without DAC is a subcutaneous injection; MK-677 is taken by mouth. That is the difference most people actually feel: CJC-1295 without DAC means reconstituting a vial and injecting; MK-677 does not require either. If needles are the deciding factor, this line settles it before any of the rest matters.
The kinetics are roughly 48× apart — 24 h for MK-677 against 30 min for CJC-1295 without DAC — and yet both are dosed once daily. That schedule is convention rather than clearance, which is worth knowing before you assume the two behave the same way between doses.
Committed time differs: CJC-1295 without DAC runs 12 weeks, MK-677 runs 16 weeks.
Source notes
What the evidence actually says
Verbatim, so you can check the verdict above against what it was built from.
CJC-1295 without DAC (Mod GRF 1-29)
Tetra-substituted GHRH (1-29) with no Drug Affinity Complex, so it clears in roughly 30 minutes and produces a single discrete GH pulse. That short half-life is the whole point: it is dosed once to three times daily, typically around 100 mcg (roughly 1-2 mcg/kg, a saturating pulse dose) on an empty stomach, and is paired with a ghrelin agonist such as ipamorelin. It is NOT an approved medicine; the closest approved comparators are sermorelin and tesamorelin. Consumer supply is research-chemical grade and dosing convention comes from practice, not from a label.
MK-677 (Ibutamoren)
Orally active, long-acting ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) agonist that raises GH and IGF-1 for around 24 hours per dose. It has been through multiple human trials, including a two-year study in older adults, but was never approved for any indication and trials also flagged increased fasting glucose and reduced insulin sensitivity. It is a non-peptide small molecule, so it is taken by mouth rather than injected.
Side by side
The numbers
| Attribute | CJC-1295 without DAC | MK-677 |
|---|---|---|
| Class | GH secretagogue | GH secretagogue |
| Routes | Subcutaneous | Oral |
| Dose range | 100 mcg–300 mcg (typical 100 mcg) | 10 mg–25 mg (typical 15 mg) |
| Frequency | Once daily | Once daily |
| Half-life | 30 min | 24 h |
| Cycle length | 12 weeks | 16 weeks |
| Experience | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| Evidence | Practice-derived only | Controlled human trials |
| Contraindications |
|
|
| Side effects |
|
|
Turn a typical dose into a mark on the syringe: CJC-1295 without DAC
Goals
Where they overlap, and where they do not
| Goal | CJC-1295 without DAC | MK-677 |
|---|---|---|
| recovery and sleep | CJC-1295 without DAC: 4/5 | MK-677: 5/5 |
| muscle growth | CJC-1295 without DAC: 3/5 | MK-677: 4/5 |
| injury repair | CJC-1295 without DAC: 3/5 | MK-677: 2/5 |
| longevity | CJC-1295 without DAC: 2/5 | MK-677: 2/5 |
| appetite controlone only | CJC-1295 without DAC: — | MK-677: 5/5 |
| fat lossone only | CJC-1295 without DAC: 2/5 | MK-677: — |
| skin and hairone only | CJC-1295 without DAC: — | MK-677: 2/5 |
They overlap on 4 goals and diverge on 3. Weights are this site’s editorial priority score out of 5 — how central a goal is to why people use a compound. They are not effect sizes and two 5s do not mean two equal results.
Next
Go deeper
Related
Other comparisons with these two
Educational information only, not medical advice. Talk to a licensed clinician before starting, changing, or stopping anything.