Head to head
CJC-1295 with DAC vs CJC-1295 without DAC
A comparison decided mostly by evidence: CJC-1295 with DAC has been studied in people to a degree the other has not.
Verdict
CJC-1295 with DAC rests on firmer evidence
What you are actually choosing between
Both are classed here as growth hormone secretagogues, so this is a within-class choice: the mechanism is broadly shared and what separates them is kinetics, route, and how much has actually been tested.
The overlap is muscle growth, recovery and sleep, and injury repair. On this site's goal weighting — an editorial priority score, not a measure of effect size — CJC-1295 with DAC rates 4/5 for muscle growth and CJC-1295 without DAC rates 3/5.
The evidence
This is the part that decides most of it. CJC-1295 with DAC has some human data, but it is small, old, or uncontrolled — phase 1 single-dose studies only; development was discontinued. CJC-1295 without DAC has no controlled human data at all, so the numbers here come from practice, not a label — the closest approved comparators are sermorelin and tesamorelin. That gap is the headline, and it is a statement about the literature rather than a promise about you: a compound with trial data can still do nothing for your case, and one without it is unproven rather than disproven.
How they differ in practice
Kinetics are not close. CJC-1295 with DAC has a half-life of 7 days against CJC-1295 without DAC's 30 min — more than two orders of magnitude — which is why one is dosed once a week and the other once daily. A long half-life means a steadier level and a mistake you cannot take back for days; a short one means timing matters and a bad day washes out fast.
Source notes
What the evidence actually says
Verbatim, so you can check the verdict above against what it was built from.
CJC-1295 with DAC
Dosed once weekly at 1 to 2 mg, which is how it is overwhelmingly run in practice: the albumin binding makes the weekly total the meaningful quantity, and splitting it across the week buys nothing. A GHRH (1-29) analogue carrying a Drug Affinity Complex maleimide that binds serum albumin, which is the ONLY reason it differs from the no-DAC version: the terminal half-life runs roughly 6 to 8 days instead of minutes, so a single dose produces a sustained rise in GH and IGF-1 rather than a discrete pulse. Phase 1 human dosing studies used single subcutaneous doses of about 30 to 250 mcg/kg. Development was discontinued and it is NOT approved by any regulator; consumer supply is research-chemical grade. Because exposure is continuous rather than pulsatile, it is the less physiologic of the two CJC-1295 forms and carries more of the water-retention and glucose signal.
CJC-1295 without DAC (Mod GRF 1-29)
Tetra-substituted GHRH (1-29) with no Drug Affinity Complex, so it clears in roughly 30 minutes and produces a single discrete GH pulse. That short half-life is the whole point: it is dosed once to three times daily, typically around 100 mcg (roughly 1-2 mcg/kg, a saturating pulse dose) on an empty stomach, and is paired with a ghrelin agonist such as ipamorelin. It is NOT an approved medicine; the closest approved comparators are sermorelin and tesamorelin. Consumer supply is research-chemical grade and dosing convention comes from practice, not from a label.
Side by side
The numbers
| Attribute | CJC-1295 with DAC | CJC-1295 without DAC |
|---|---|---|
| Class | GH secretagogue | GH secretagogue |
| Routes | Subcutaneous | Subcutaneous |
| Dose range | 1 mg–2 mg (typical 1.5 mg) | 100 mcg–300 mcg (typical 100 mcg) |
| Frequency | Once a week | Once daily |
| Half-life | 7 days | 30 min |
| Cycle length | 12 weeks | 12 weeks |
| Experience | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| Evidence | Limited human data | Practice-derived only |
| Contraindications |
|
|
| Side effects |
|
|
Turn a typical dose into a mark on the syringe: CJC-1295 with DACCJC-1295 without DAC
Goals
Where they overlap, and where they do not
| Goal | CJC-1295 with DAC | CJC-1295 without DAC |
|---|---|---|
| muscle growth | CJC-1295 with DAC: 4/5 | CJC-1295 without DAC: 3/5 |
| recovery and sleep | CJC-1295 with DAC: 3/5 | CJC-1295 without DAC: 4/5 |
| injury repair | CJC-1295 with DAC: 3/5 | CJC-1295 without DAC: 3/5 |
| fat loss | CJC-1295 with DAC: 2/5 | CJC-1295 without DAC: 2/5 |
| longevity | CJC-1295 with DAC: 2/5 | CJC-1295 without DAC: 2/5 |
They overlap on 5 goals and diverge on 0. Weights are this site’s editorial priority score out of 5 — how central a goal is to why people use a compound. They are not effect sizes and two 5s do not mean two equal results.
Next
Go deeper
Related
Other comparisons with these two
Educational information only, not medical advice. Talk to a licensed clinician before starting, changing, or stopping anything.