Head to head

Cagrilintide vs MK-677

MetabolicGH secretagogue

Matching appetite control scores that point opposite ways — plus the dose, kinetics and evidence side by side.

Verdict

Same score, opposite directions

Both are weighted for appetite control, but a weight measures force, not direction: MK-677 moves it the wrong way for anyone chasing appetite control, and Cagrilintide moves it the right way. Which one you want is settled by direction, not by the matching score.

What you are actually choosing between

These sit in different classes. Cagrilintide is a metabolic compound; MK-677 is a growth hormone secretagogue. They get compared because of where they overlap, not because they are interchangeable.

The overlap is appetite control. On this site's goal weighting — an editorial priority score, not a measure of effect size — Cagrilintide rates 5/5 for appetite control and MK-677 rates 5/5. Outside that overlap they diverge: Cagrilintide also carries weight for fat loss and metabolic health, MK-677 for recovery and sleep and muscle growth.

One trap on this pairing: both score highly for appetite control, but they push it in opposite directions. MK-677 is flagged in this dataset as moving it the wrong way, while Cagrilintide lists reduced appetite among its side effects. A goal weight measures how hard a compound acts on something, not which way it acts — so this is the one place on the page where a tie is not a tie.

The evidence

Neither has an evidence edge — both sit at the same tier. Cagrilintide: controlled human trials behind it, without an approval; investigational; standalone long-term data does not exist yet. MK-677: controlled human trials behind it, without an approval; never approved, and trials flagged higher fasting glucose. Anyone telling you one is clearly better supported than the other is going beyond what is published.

How they differ in practice

Cagrilintide is a subcutaneous injection; MK-677 is taken by mouth. That is the difference most people actually feel: Cagrilintide means reconstituting a vial and injecting; MK-677 does not require either. If needles are the deciding factor, this line settles it before any of the rest matters.

Kinetics are not close. Cagrilintide has a half-life of 7.5 days against MK-677's 24 h — roughly 8× — which is why one is dosed once a week and the other once daily. A long half-life means a steadier level and a mistake you cannot take back for days; a short one means timing matters and a bad day washes out fast.

One of these has an end date and the other does not: Cagrilintide runs no fixed cycle, MK-677 runs 16 weeks. An open-ended compound is a standing commitment, not a course you finish. Cagrilintide also escalates through a titration schedule rather than holding one dose, so its first weeks are not its steady state.

Risk and difficulty

The contraindication lists are not the same: MK-677 flags active malignancy, which Cagrilintide does not. If any of those describe you they remove a compound from consideration outright, regardless of everything above.

MK-677 is rated intermediate here and Cagrilintide advanced. That rating is about how much can go wrong in handling, dosing and monitoring, not about how well either works.

Source notes

What the evidence actually says

Verbatim, so you can check the verdict above against what it was built from.

Cagrilintide

Long-acting amylin analogue, not a GLP-1. Phase 2 randomized human trials dosed 0.3 to 4.5 mg once weekly with 4-week step-ups, and it is in phase 3 combined with semaglutide as CagriSema. It is investigational and NOT approved anywhere as a standalone product. Amylin analogues act on satiety through a different receptor to GLP-1, which is the rationale for the combination, but standalone long-term data does not yet exist.

MK-677 (Ibutamoren)

Orally active, long-acting ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) agonist that raises GH and IGF-1 for around 24 hours per dose. It has been through multiple human trials, including a two-year study in older adults, but was never approved for any indication and trials also flagged increased fasting glucose and reduced insulin sensitivity. It is a non-peptide small molecule, so it is taken by mouth rather than injected.

Side by side

The numbers

Cagrilintide compared with MK-677
AttributeCagrilintideMK-677
ClassMetabolicGH secretagogue
RoutesSubcutaneousOral
Dose range300 mcg–4.5 mg (typical 2.4 mg)10 mg–25 mg (typical 15 mg)
FrequencyOnce a weekOnce daily
Half-life7.5 days24 h
Cycle lengthNo fixed cycle16 weeks
ExperienceAdvancedIntermediate
EvidenceControlled human trialsControlled human trials
Contraindications
  • Pregnant / nursing
  • Under 18
  • Pregnant / nursing
  • Active malignancy
  • Under 18
Side effects
  • Nausea, generally milder than with a GLP-1 at equivalent appetite suppression
  • Constipation
  • Injection site reactions
  • Reduced appetite and early satiety
  • Pronounced increase in appetite, often within the first few days
  • Water retention, puffiness in the face and ankles, and rapid scale weight gain
  • Raised fasting blood glucose and reduced insulin sensitivity — a real concern for anyone prediabetic or diabetic, and worth monitoring with bloodwork on longer runs
  • Lethargy or grogginess the morning after a pre-bed dose
  • Numbness or tingling in the hands, sometimes carpal-tunnel-like
  • Vivid dreams and deeper but occasionally disrupted sleep
  • Mild joint aches at higher doses

Turn a typical dose into a mark on the syringe: Cagrilintide

Goals

Where they overlap, and where they do not

GoalCagrilintideMK-677
appetite control
Cagrilintide: 5/5
MK-677: 5/5
recovery and sleepone only
Cagrilintide:
MK-677: 5/5
fat lossone only
Cagrilintide: 4/5
MK-677:
muscle growthone only
Cagrilintide:
MK-677: 4/5
metabolic healthone only
Cagrilintide: 3/5
MK-677:
injury repairone only
Cagrilintide:
MK-677: 2/5
longevityone only
Cagrilintide:
MK-677: 2/5
skin and hairone only
Cagrilintide:
MK-677: 2/5

They overlap on 1 goal and diverge on 7. Weights are this site’s editorial priority score out of 5 — how central a goal is to why people use a compound. They are not effect sizes and two 5s do not mean two equal results.

Next

Go deeper

Related

Other comparisons with these two

Educational information only, not medical advice. Talk to a licensed clinician before starting, changing, or stopping anything.