Head to head

Cagrilintide vs MOTS-c

Metabolic

Side-by-side on metabolic health, dosing, kinetics and evidence — with an honest verdict at the end.

Verdict

No winner in this data

The evidence tiers match and the goal overlap is real, so nothing here supports calling one better. What separates them is practical: once a week on no fixed cycle for Cagrilintide against twice a week on 8 weeks for MOTS-c. Pick the one you will actually run correctly.

What you are actually choosing between

Both are classed here as metabolic compounds, so this is a within-class choice: the mechanism is broadly shared and what separates them is kinetics, route, and how much has actually been tested.

The overlap is metabolic health and fat loss. On this site's goal weighting — an editorial priority score, not a measure of effect size — Cagrilintide rates 3/5 for metabolic health and MOTS-c rates 5/5. Outside that overlap they diverge: Cagrilintide also carries weight for appetite control, MOTS-c for longevity.

The evidence

Cagrilintide sits one step firmer: controlled human trials behind it, without an approval — investigational; standalone long-term data does not exist yet. MOTS-c has some human data, but it is small, old, or uncontrolled — the human data is observational, not interventional. One tier is a real difference but not a decisive one; it should not on its own settle the choice.

How they differ in practice

Cagrilintide has a characterized half-life of 7.5 days; MOTS-c does not have one published here at all. That asymmetry is worth more than it looks — it usually tracks how much formal pharmacology has been done on a compound.

One of these has an end date and the other does not: Cagrilintide runs no fixed cycle, MOTS-c runs 8 weeks. An open-ended compound is a standing commitment, not a course you finish. Cagrilintide also escalates through a titration schedule rather than holding one dose, so its first weeks are not its steady state.

Source notes

What the evidence actually says

Verbatim, so you can check the verdict above against what it was built from.

Cagrilintide

Long-acting amylin analogue, not a GLP-1. Phase 2 randomized human trials dosed 0.3 to 4.5 mg once weekly with 4-week step-ups, and it is in phase 3 combined with semaglutide as CagriSema. It is investigational and NOT approved anywhere as a standalone product. Amylin analogues act on satiety through a different receptor to GLP-1, which is the rationale for the combination, but standalone long-term data does not yet exist.

MOTS-c

A 16-amino-acid mitochondrial-derived peptide encoded within the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene. Mechanistically it is linked to AMPK activation and the folate / one-carbon pathway. The strong data are preclinical: injected MOTS-c improved insulin sensitivity, reduced diet-induced obesity and improved physical capacity in mice, including in aged animals. Human data is limited and mostly observational rather than interventional — circulating MOTS-c levels have been measured in relation to exercise, age, insulin resistance and a longevity-associated mitochondrial variant, but there is no established human dosing trial and no approved product. The figures here are compounding-pharmacy and community convention scaled off the 10 mg vial that is the usual market size, not trial-derived doses. The starting point is 2.5 mg twice a week; 5 mg once a week is the same weekly total and is run the same way. Vendor guides also describe a daily 0.5-1 mg microdose pattern, which reaches comparable weekly exposure by a different route. Human half-life has not been characterized, so it is left null rather than estimated.

Side by side

The numbers

Cagrilintide compared with MOTS-c
AttributeCagrilintideMOTS-c
ClassMetabolicMetabolic
RoutesSubcutaneousSubcutaneous
Dose range300 mcg–4.5 mg (typical 2.4 mg)2.5 mg–5 mg (typical 2.5 mg)
FrequencyOnce a weekTwice a week
Half-life7.5 daysNot characterized
Cycle lengthNo fixed cycle8 weeks
ExperienceAdvancedAdvanced
EvidenceControlled human trialsLimited human data
Contraindications
  • Pregnant / nursing
  • Under 18
  • Pregnant / nursing
  • Under 18
Side effects
  • Nausea, generally milder than with a GLP-1 at equivalent appetite suppression
  • Constipation
  • Injection site reactions
  • Reduced appetite and early satiety
  • Injection site redness or soreness
  • Fatigue or flushing after a dose
  • Headache
  • Longer-term safety in humans is simply unknown

Turn a typical dose into a mark on the syringe: CagrilintideMOTS-c

Goals

Where they overlap, and where they do not

GoalCagrilintideMOTS-c
metabolic health
Cagrilintide: 3/5
MOTS-c: 5/5
fat loss
Cagrilintide: 4/5
MOTS-c: 4/5
appetite controlone only
Cagrilintide: 5/5
MOTS-c:
longevityone only
Cagrilintide:
MOTS-c: 4/5
muscle growthone only
Cagrilintide:
MOTS-c: 2/5
recovery and sleepone only
Cagrilintide:
MOTS-c: 2/5

They overlap on 2 goals and diverge on 4. Weights are this site’s editorial priority score out of 5 — how central a goal is to why people use a compound. They are not effect sizes and two 5s do not mean two equal results.

Next

Go deeper

Related

Other comparisons with these two

Educational information only, not medical advice. Talk to a licensed clinician before starting, changing, or stopping anything.